最近國內唱片公司展開大力炒作的Feist。
明明是"Let It Die"，就是非得翻成"讓她飛"不行。這是怎麼回事，音樂創作一定得當成股票明牌來操盤是吧？台灣的唱片公司再這樣故步自封食古不化，市場全面崩盤是遲早的事。
很欠揍的MV，請享用。
明明是"Let It Die"，就是非得翻成"讓她飛"不行。這是怎麼回事，音樂創作一定得當成股票明牌來操盤是吧？台灣的唱片公司再這樣故步自封食古不化，市場全面崩盤是遲早的事。
很欠揍的MV，請享用。
目前分類：吉光片羽 (171)
- Jun 20 Tue 2006 17:01
有一天晚上。
- Jun 20 Tue 2006 14:03
無心的呢喃。
獻給我的弟弟青蚵男。儘管風風雨雨，他還是一樣地支持著喬治。
誠然美好的舊時光，後來重唱的那個傢伙實在很糟糕。
誠然美好的舊時光，後來重唱的那個傢伙實在很糟糕。
- Jun 19 Mon 2006 14:52
瞧你幹的好事。
常打電話給鮑伯或沒事就偷窺Finalhouse網誌的人應該對這首歌很熟了。
感覺頗奇怪的一首歌，前半段挺像Guns 'n Roses的November Rain，到了後頭又像是諸多Oasis偷學The Beatles的慢板歌之一。
感覺頗奇怪的一首歌，前半段挺像Guns 'n Roses的November Rain，到了後頭又像是諸多Oasis偷學The Beatles的慢板歌之一。
- Jun 19 Mon 2006 14:24
因應德國世足風......
"德勒斯登"娃娃的<�情趣男孩>（？），曲調十分戰前德國小酒館風。
好啦，我知道很牽強，他們其實是來自波士頓的龐克新浪潮。
令我想起90年代初期，某國際音樂頻道剛進軍亞洲時的某些歌曲某些MV。
好啦，我知道很牽強，他們其實是來自波士頓的龐克新浪潮。
令我想起90年代初期，某國際音樂頻道剛進軍亞洲時的某些歌曲某些MV。
- Jun 17 Sat 2006 06:46
我是怪胎。
只要是人，沒有不愛這首歌的吧？
- Jun 16 Fri 2006 15:09
燃燒的波西米亞狂想曲。
紅唇們似乎挺愛"Bohemian Rhapsody"這首曲子，還自拍了頗為「養眼」的MV：
- Jun 16 Fri 2006 15:00
燃燒吧！紅唇
本人最近最愛當屬The Flaming Lips。
先送上一段傳說中The Flaming Lips主演的"Christmas on Mars"預告片段。隨便看看，別太認真：
先送上一段傳說中The Flaming Lips主演的"Christmas on Mars"預告片段。隨便看看，別太認真：
- Jun 14 Wed 2006 12:26
同是天涯淪落人。
- Jun 07 Wed 2006 17:29
全然Jay and Silent Bob調調......
這就叫做......「天衣無縫」嗎？
- May 19 Fri 2006 13:44
老師在說都沒有在聽。
`Da Vinci' Mystery: How Can the Movie Be This Bad?
By Rick Warner
May 18 (Bloomberg) -- ``The Da Vinci Code'' purports to solve the greatest mystery in human history. Ron Howard's movie version of Dan Brown's mega-selling novel poses another puzzler: How could such a respected and experienced director transform this page-turning thriller into one of the most boring big- budget flicks ever made?
At an excruciatingly long 2 1/2 hours, ``Da Vinci'' works better as sedative than stimulant. It's a $125 million turkey -- a lifeless, confusing, overly talky film that's equally harsh on the ears and eyes. Viewers are assaulted with trite dialogue, cheesy flashbacks and cinematography so dark that you feel as if you're trapped in a cave.
The book is no literary masterpiece -- one critic called it a ``best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence'' -- but at least Brown kept the story about the search for Jesus's family tree moving at a brisk pace. The movie, written by Akiva Goldsman (who collaborated with Howard on the Oscar-winning ``A Beautiful Mind''), has a poor sense of timing and little sense of humor or style.
No historical or religious background -- and the story is crammed with both -- is relayed without excessive details and pontification. Whether we're learning about the conservative Catholic sect Opus Dei, Leonardo da Vinci or the secretive Priory of Sion, it's like being trapped in history class with a windbag professor.
Wooden Hanks
Even scenes that should be fascinating -- like the one where eccentric scholar Sir Leigh Teabing (Ian McKellen) explains the hidden meaning of ``The Last Supper'' to Harvard symbology professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) and police cryptologist Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou) -- come across as pedantic set pieces that are no more illuminating than the dim lighting.
``I'm into something here that I can't understand,'' Hanks says.
Me, too, Tom.
Hanks, a two-time Oscar winner who previously worked with Howard on ``Apollo 13'' and ``Splash,'' gives what may be his worst dramatic performance as a professor suspected of murdering a curator at the Louvre. He looks uncomfortable from start to finish -- maybe it's that goofy, slicked-back hairdo -- and his wooden manner seems more suited to a wax museum than a Hollywood blockbuster.
Wasted Cast
The distinguished supporting cast is almost entirely wasted, including Tautou, Paul Bettany as the self-flagellating albino killer, Jean Reno as the grim police captain who stalks Langdon, and Alfred Molina as a sinister bishop. Only McKellen, as the crippled Holy Grail expert, appears to be having any fun. He steals every scene he's in with his loopy looks and maniacal energy.
The millions who've read the book won't find many surprises. Those who haven't read it are likely to be confounded by the intricate plot, which starts out as a murder mystery and turns into a search for the long-buried secret of Jesus's personal life.
Under attack by outraged Catholics and offended albinos, the film's producers shrouded ``The Da Vinci Code'' in secrecy and refused to show it to critics until the last minute. That was probably a wise choice. Although it's bound to be a box- office hit on opening weekend because of the built-in audience, word of mouth may break this code.
``The Da Vinci Code,'' from Columbia Pictures, opens worldwide today and tomorrow.
By Rick Warner
May 18 (Bloomberg) -- ``The Da Vinci Code'' purports to solve the greatest mystery in human history. Ron Howard's movie version of Dan Brown's mega-selling novel poses another puzzler: How could such a respected and experienced director transform this page-turning thriller into one of the most boring big- budget flicks ever made?
At an excruciatingly long 2 1/2 hours, ``Da Vinci'' works better as sedative than stimulant. It's a $125 million turkey -- a lifeless, confusing, overly talky film that's equally harsh on the ears and eyes. Viewers are assaulted with trite dialogue, cheesy flashbacks and cinematography so dark that you feel as if you're trapped in a cave.
The book is no literary masterpiece -- one critic called it a ``best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence'' -- but at least Brown kept the story about the search for Jesus's family tree moving at a brisk pace. The movie, written by Akiva Goldsman (who collaborated with Howard on the Oscar-winning ``A Beautiful Mind''), has a poor sense of timing and little sense of humor or style.
No historical or religious background -- and the story is crammed with both -- is relayed without excessive details and pontification. Whether we're learning about the conservative Catholic sect Opus Dei, Leonardo da Vinci or the secretive Priory of Sion, it's like being trapped in history class with a windbag professor.
Wooden Hanks
Even scenes that should be fascinating -- like the one where eccentric scholar Sir Leigh Teabing (Ian McKellen) explains the hidden meaning of ``The Last Supper'' to Harvard symbology professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) and police cryptologist Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou) -- come across as pedantic set pieces that are no more illuminating than the dim lighting.
``I'm into something here that I can't understand,'' Hanks says.
Me, too, Tom.
Hanks, a two-time Oscar winner who previously worked with Howard on ``Apollo 13'' and ``Splash,'' gives what may be his worst dramatic performance as a professor suspected of murdering a curator at the Louvre. He looks uncomfortable from start to finish -- maybe it's that goofy, slicked-back hairdo -- and his wooden manner seems more suited to a wax museum than a Hollywood blockbuster.
Wasted Cast
The distinguished supporting cast is almost entirely wasted, including Tautou, Paul Bettany as the self-flagellating albino killer, Jean Reno as the grim police captain who stalks Langdon, and Alfred Molina as a sinister bishop. Only McKellen, as the crippled Holy Grail expert, appears to be having any fun. He steals every scene he's in with his loopy looks and maniacal energy.
The millions who've read the book won't find many surprises. Those who haven't read it are likely to be confounded by the intricate plot, which starts out as a murder mystery and turns into a search for the long-buried secret of Jesus's personal life.
Under attack by outraged Catholics and offended albinos, the film's producers shrouded ``The Da Vinci Code'' in secrecy and refused to show it to critics until the last minute. That was probably a wise choice. Although it's bound to be a box- office hit on opening weekend because of the built-in audience, word of mouth may break this code.
``The Da Vinci Code,'' from Columbia Pictures, opens worldwide today and tomorrow.
- May 04 Thu 2006 15:51
禍水。
http://www.j-ent.com.tw/water/
經手過的影片不算少，敢推薦給別人看的倒不多（純粹就通俗程度而言）。
一部是很純情可愛的泰國片<<�真情收音機>>，另外一部就是即將上演的<<�禍水>>了。
理由很簡單，男的俊女的美，歌曲動聽劇情感人。可以算是藝術片種中的芭樂片了。
我也是第一次翻譯到自己忍不住絞冷筍，在<<�禍水>>結尾的時候。只差沒跟著加速離站的火車飆出幾顆珠淚......
人家的影業發達不是沒有原因的，就是拍得出言之有物雅俗共賞的劇情片。-->這句話不包括韓國片喔，每次看韓片我只會意識到「這場戲導演在幹嘛編劇當初怎麼設計演員如何走位」云云。他們的影像工業的確很發達，但片子實在很難看。
岔開重點了，不必去看小螢幕電視劇格局的MI:3了，整齣戲有如某人的PR長片 + 雙面女間諜。這筆錢倒不如省下來去看看印度的真情羅曼史，何況人家的愛情戲感人自然多了。
經手過的影片不算少，敢推薦給別人看的倒不多（純粹就通俗程度而言）。
一部是很純情可愛的泰國片<<�真情收音機>>，另外一部就是即將上演的<<�禍水>>了。
理由很簡單，男的俊女的美，歌曲動聽劇情感人。可以算是藝術片種中的芭樂片了。
我也是第一次翻譯到自己忍不住絞冷筍，在<<�禍水>>結尾的時候。只差沒跟著加速離站的火車飆出幾顆珠淚......
人家的影業發達不是沒有原因的，就是拍得出言之有物雅俗共賞的劇情片。-->這句話不包括韓國片喔，每次看韓片我只會意識到「這場戲導演在幹嘛編劇當初怎麼設計演員如何走位」云云。他們的影像工業的確很發達，但片子實在很難看。
岔開重點了，不必去看小螢幕電視劇格局的MI:3了，整齣戲有如某人的PR長片 + 雙面女間諜。這筆錢倒不如省下來去看看印度的真情羅曼史，何況人家的愛情戲感人自然多了。
